The Week in Review

Yesterday I saw Jimmy Carter.  Today I was incompletely quoted in the newspaper published from our state’s capital city, and while what what they included was fine, they left out the best part.  This evening, I had three “bar” shots of Tequila (which I haven’t done in quite a long time) , at home in the safety of my own kitchen and they knocked me on my virtual posterior.

I must say that I’m not much impressed with myself.

Published in:  on May 2, 2008 at 7:37 pm Comments (2)
Tags:

So, today was a better day

I didn’t pull a rabbit out of the hat today, but the odds were against me on that one anyway. I did, however, make friends with the rabbit warden and a few other folks at the farm, which is a fairly good trick in and of itself.

It was a long day. It started at 4:00 a.m. and involved over 350 miles of driving, followed by a couple of hours of intense office work. And you know what? I enjoyed the hell out of it. I realize that it has been far too long since I have been able to take such pleasure in my work. It was a little hard getting back in the saddle again, but a few more like this and I should be riding quite well.

Having 5+ hours in the car by myself wasn’t bad either. It was nice to have quiet time. It was also nice to have good cell phone reception so I didn’t feel isolated while I was doing it. I didn’t do much talking, but the silence feels more respectful when one is reachable.

The other upswing is that The Sick was apparently properly embarrassed by its public exposure. It backed way down today. It’s not gone completely, but I feel like a human being again.

The final bit of this day was a follow-up phone call from a friend. It was a real joy to talk with her two nights in a row. And I love the ringtone I’ve given her. Tickles me every time it goes off.

And so, to bed. That’s the very best part of a good day.

Published in:  on January 31, 2007 at 10:04 pm Leave a Comment

And then the coffee pot flooded

It really is beginning to look like one of those days.

Published in:  on January 23, 2007 at 12:43 pm Comments (1)

Paralegal licensing–what I think about it.

Licensing is done for the protection of the public. Since there are only a very few instances in which a paralegal may provide services directly to the public, I don’t believe there’s any need for us to be licensed. In this, there is a distinct difference between us and nurse practitioners. While some may feel that there is a need for an equivalent level of service in the law, I am not among them. I believe we can best contribute to cost effective legal services for the public by working under the supervision of licensed attorneys.

That having been said, I believe it helps us to pursue voluntary certification programs to give our prospective employing attorneys an indication that we have attained a defined level of competence. I’m in North Carolina where NALA’s designations are recognized by our Bar. In other regions of the country, the examinations and credentials offered by other organizations may be more familiar to attorneys. It is my opinion that what matters is our willingness to commit to doing whatever is necessary to attain those certifications and diligently pursue continuing legal education to stay at the top of our game.

As one of the old guard (28+ years) who came up through the law firm-trained system, I liken myself the lawyers of long ago who learned by “reading the law” and being trained by more experienced attorneys. As I understand the history, the next thing to come along for attorneys was licensing for those who provide direct legal services to the public. It is only during my time of working in the law that all states required prospective bar exam candidates to attend law schools.

It makes sense to me that we would follow that model. Our timeframe has been foreshortened from that the attorneys enjoyed by the incredible advances in technology which make everything happen faster. Because communications happen with far greater speed than they did even when I began, I believe our attorneys often do not have the time to educate their staff as they did in the past. Further, law has, in many instances, become more specialized and not all firms can give their staff members good general instruction in the law. Therefore, we have schools to ensure that upcoming paralegals have an opportunity to learn at least the bare basics of most areas of the law.

I recognize the old definition of the professional, which was extended only to those engaged in doctoring, lawyering, and preaching. Each requires advanced education, a commitment and dedication to the ideal of subject area, and an oath to uphold that ideal. To the best of my knowledge, it is only these professions which provide full confidentiality of communications. As much as I hold myself to the same standard as attorneys, I am not one. The “para” in my title begs the question.

Published in:  on January 19, 2007 at 6:16 pm Leave a Comment